Search

This determination arises out of the stated intention of the Tribunal in Report No 5, 1996 Hunter Water Corporation, Prices of Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Services to undertake a mid-term review of the four year price path set for Hunter W

This determination arises out of the stated intention of the Tribunal in Report No 6, 1996 Sydney Water Corporation, Prices of Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Services to undertake amid-term review of the four year price path set for Sydney Wa

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales (the Tribunal) regulates the charges that the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC) levies for services relating to the delivery of bulk water to farmers, irrigators, in

As required by section 12(1) of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (the Tribunal) has investigated information presented by the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC)

Explains draft determination on maximum prices the Department of Land and Water Conservation can charge for services related to delivery of bulk water to farmers, irrigators, industrial users and town water suppliers.

The Tribunal has decided that Sydney Water’s overall revenue should increase in line with movements in the consumer price index (CPI) in each year of the determination period.

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales (the Tribunal) has completed its 2002 review of metropolitan water businesses.

The Tribunal has found that Sydney Catchment Authority’s existing price path to June 2005 remains appropriate.

For this determination, the Tribunal has conducted an extensive public consultative process, reviewed all written submissions and held public hearings.

OP16Presents findings and recommendations of GHD’s review of metropolitan water agencies’ trade waste pricing proposals, commissioned as part of the Tribunal’s 2003 water price review.

Subsequent to the release of Determination 5.2, 1997, the distributors raised some concerns about the price levels that had been determined. This led the Tribunal to commission an independent review.

Avoided Distribution Costs and Congestion Pricing

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (the Tribunal) of New South Wales (NSW) appointed Halcrow Management Science (HMS) in September 2001 to carry out a review of the system performance and customer service standards in Hunter Water Cor

The Tribunal has commissioned the Allen Consulting Group to prepare a report on the integration of service standards and price.

The introduction of A New Tax System (ANTS) could have led to double counting of the effects of ANTS in increasing regulated prices. IPART avoided this double counting by adopting the following two-step process.

Avoided Distribution Costs and Congestion Pricing for Distribution Networks in NSW

As required by Section 11(1) of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal has investigated proposals by the State Rail Authority (a standing reference agency in Schedule 1 of the Act)

The Tribunal’s determination of maximum pricing for streetlighting services will continue to be necessary as long as effective competition does not exist.

Final report prepared by SKM for IPART titled Review of the Performance Criteria in Sydney Catchment Authority's Operating Licence published in July 2003.

Provides responses to IPART’s questions about Meritec’s review of capital and operating expenditure (total cost review), commissioned as part of the 2004 distribution pricing review.