This determination arises out of the stated intention of the Tribunal in Report No 5, 1996 Hunter Water Corporation, Prices of Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Services to undertake a mid-term review of the four year price path set for Hunter W
This determination arises out of the stated intention of the Tribunal in Report No 6, 1996 Sydney Water Corporation, Prices of Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Services to undertake amid-term review of the four year price path set for Sydney Wa
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales (the Tribunal) regulates the charges that the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC) levies for services relating to the delivery of bulk water to farmers, irrigators, in
As required by section 12(1) of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (the Tribunal) has investigated information presented by the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC)
Explains draft determination on maximum prices the Department of Land and Water Conservation can charge for services related to delivery of bulk water to farmers, irrigators, industrial users and town water suppliers.
Subsequent to the release of Determination 5.2, 1997, the distributors raised some concerns about the price levels that had been determined. This led the Tribunal to commission an independent review.
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (the Tribunal) of New South Wales (NSW) appointed Halcrow Management Science (HMS) in September 2001 to carry out a review of the system performance and customer service standards in Hunter Water Cor
The introduction of A New Tax System (ANTS) could have led to double counting of the effects of ANTS in increasing regulated prices. IPART avoided this double counting by adopting the following two-step process.
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Oakley Greenwood to consider stakeholder comments on its March 2017 report relating to cost drivers for wholesale sewerage services and cost impacts of recycled water plants.
IPART engaged Oakley Greenwood to provide revised estimates of the costs to a reasonably efficient competitor of providing retail and reticulation services.
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Agripath to estimate water users’ capacity to pay in the North Coast and South Coast valleys for WaterNSW’s rural bulk water services.
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Aither to review options and establish key principles for setting prices for WaterNSW’s rural bulk water services in valleys substantially below full cost recovery..
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Aither to review WaterNSW’s capital expenditure, asset planning and operating expenditure proposals for rural bulk water services.
IPART re-engaged the consultancy firm Agripath to review and respond to stakeholders’ submissions on water users’ capacity to pay for WaterNSW’s rural bulk water services in the North Coast and South Coast valleys.
As required by Section 11(1) of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal has investigated proposals by the State Rail Authority (a standing reference agency in Schedule 1 of the Act)
The Tribunal’s determination of maximum pricing for streetlighting services will continue to be necessary as long as effective competition does not exist.
IPART re-engaged the consultancy firm Aither to review WaterNSW’s response to the draft decisions on proposed expenditure in the Draft Report, including decisions on capital expenditure, asset renewals and operating expenditure for rural bulk wate
