This determination arises out of the stated intention of the Tribunal in Report No 5, 1996 Hunter Water Corporation, Prices of Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Services to undertake a mid-term review of the four year price path set for Hunter W
This determination arises out of the stated intention of the Tribunal in Report No 6, 1996 Sydney Water Corporation, Prices of Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Services to undertake amid-term review of the four year price path set for Sydney Wa
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales (the Tribunal) regulates the charges that the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC) levies for services relating to the delivery of bulk water to farmers, irrigators, in
As required by section 12(1) of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (the Tribunal) has investigated information presented by the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC)
Explains draft determination on maximum prices the Department of Land and Water Conservation can charge for services related to delivery of bulk water to farmers, irrigators, industrial users and town water suppliers.
Subsequent to the release of Determination 5.2, 1997, the distributors raised some concerns about the price levels that had been determined. This led the Tribunal to commission an independent review.
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (the Tribunal) of New South Wales (NSW) appointed Halcrow Management Science (HMS) in September 2001 to carry out a review of the system performance and customer service standards in Hunter Water Cor
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Aither to review Essential Energy’s capital expenditure, asset planning and operating expenditure proposals for its water and sewerage services, including its proposed consequential works, and provide analysis an
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Frontier Economics to review Essential Water’s and WaterNSW’s demand forecasts, and Essential Water’s forecast water connections, and provide analysis and recommendations for our review.
The introduction of A New Tax System (ANTS) could have led to double counting of the effects of ANTS in increasing regulated prices. IPART avoided this double counting by adopting the following two-step process.
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Marsden Jacob Associates to review Essential Water’s proposed trade waste and miscellaneous charges, and provide analysis and recommendations for our review.
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Aither to review the current approach to allocating WaterNSW and WAMC’s costs between customers and the NSW Government.
As required by Section 11(1) of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal has investigated proposals by the State Rail Authority (a standing reference agency in Schedule 1 of the Act)
The Tribunal’s determination of maximum pricing for streetlighting services will continue to be necessary as long as effective competition does not exist.
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Atkins Cardno to review Central Coast Council’s capital expenditure, asset planning and operating expenditure proposals for its water, sewerage and stormwater services and provide analysis and recommendations for
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Synergies Economic Consulting to review WaterNSW’s capital expenditure and operating expenditure proposals for its water transportation services provided by the Murray River to Broken Hill Pipeline, and provide a
IPART engaged the consultancy firm Frontier Economics to review WaterNSW’s proposed energy costs, including the procurement process undertaken by the pipeline contractor.
This study has been prepared to assist the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of NSW (IPART) assess the efficient costs of local councils providing development control services, particularly the processing of Development Applications (DAs
